Three Reasons Why We Don’t Pray the Sinner’s Prayer with Our Children

The following is a guest post by Cindy Brandt. Cindy is a Third Culture Kid (TCK) who is thinking about how to raise her own children in a non-fundamentalist manner. She has a unique voice and provocative perspective that I hope the Church will take to heart.

Praying the prayer to ask Jesus into their hearts with children is the seminal moment in evangelical families. It is believed to be the moment they are saved into securing eternity in heaven, and a commitment to follow Jesus for the rest of their lives. It is a significant and momentous event, one worthy of celebrating. And yet, even though my husband and I are both Jesus-following Christians raised with evangelical backgrounds, we have decided to not pray the sinner’s prayer with our two kids, and here are three reasons why:

1. Children are children before they are sinners.

One of the more harmful teachings of fundamentalist families is to interpret children’s normal behavior as sin. For example, toddlers test boundaries because of the curiosity wired in them, it is a necessary developmental stage to establish their growing identity. And yet, I have seen Christian parents define normal toddler defiance as evidence of sin inherent in children. I believe this is driven by the desire to get children to a place of recognizing a need for the saving grace of Jesus as quickly as possible. Define the problem ==> provide the solution.

I think this has potential to do much damage to children’s psyche by denying children’s natural, human inclinations by judging their behavior as sinful. It becomes difficult for children to listen to their own intuition, their God-given conscience because they have been taught to be self-abasing and self-denying.

I believe in sin and its many profound manifestations, and I believe Jesus is the answer to our problem of sin. But I think we must honor children’s natural developmental stages and broach the subject of sin with much care. A life of faith can be nurtured without introducing sin as the foundation of that faith. Jesus welcomed children into his presence and declared the kingdom of heaven already belongs to them.

We want our children to develop a life of faith, but not with sin as a starting point. Rather, we teach them they are created in the image of God, worthy of love and dignity.

And we skip the sinner’s prayer.

2. Assurance of salvation? Not so much.

Growing up evangelical, I was taught praying the prayer would become the mark of assurance, our get-out-of-hell card. I remember praying it with as much sincerity as I could muster, hoping God hears and receives it. Then I remember praying it again, and again, and again. If praying the prayer was supposed to be reassuring, it certainly did not work on me.

Part of the problem was how much I was afraid of going to hell, and the prayers were uttered in panic, superstitiously slipping it in here and there to be sure the magic worked. The second reason we did away with the sinner’s prayer is because we desperately don’t want our children to fall into this fear.

Another reason is that as a child, I simply craved security and needed continual reassurance of my belonging.

I don’t think that God sits up in heaven with a salvation log, and when little kids “pray the prayer”, God checks off a little box and plucks their soul from damnation to heaven. Rather, I believe God moves in the hearts and lives of people surrounding children to compel them with love. Assurance of God’s love doesn’t come packaged in a tidy little prayer, it is delivered through consistent provision of tender care by the children’s caretakers.

The prayer is a ritual in which many parents find meaning, and I can respect that. But for us, I think the content in which the ritual symbolizes is more important to focus on, and that is creating an environment of constant reassurance of our children’s value, worth, and belonging.

3. Belonging > Believing.

Every child develops at their own pace, arriving at different times to the point when they are able to consciously make a meaningful decision to follow Jesus (or not). This is the reason why baptism for children has been an issue of controversy within the Church, where denominations arbitrarily declare various ages for when salvation becomes efficacious in children.

I think every parent needs to be sensitive to their child’s spiritual development and provide that freedom and autonomy to travel the faith journey according to their own timeline. However, particularly when children are young and need structure, as Christian parents we don’t want our children to flounder without a spiritual identity.

For us, this means we have provided the Christian identity for them because they are our children: children of Christian parents. Therefore, before they are old enough to make their own faith decision, their participation in Christian traditions with us as a family is our invitation to them to come alongside us, as our family.

This is also a way for our family to live out a prophetic critique against the radical individualism of western Christianity, where faith is isolated to an individual’s personal relationship to God rather than via participation in community. Our spiritual identity is defined not only through intellectual belief, but as well through taking part of something bigger than the individual.

Our hope is that this provides a secure environment for our children, but also gives them the freedom to depart from our tradition should they desire to as they grow into adulthood.

Are our children Christians? Absolutely, not because they’ve prayed the prayer, but because for now, we’ve given them a place to belong, under the leadership of Christian parents who are doing our best to demonstrate the love and grace of Jesus Christ.

And for us, that is Christian enough.

_MG_9851_2About Cindy: Cindy Brandt blogs at She has been blogging through a series titled Raising Children Un-Fundamentalist, you can click here to read part 1  part 2  part 3  part 4  and an interview with Peter Enns on the subject. You can subscribe to her newsletter for more conversation on this subject and get her book, Outside In: Ten Christian Voices We Can’t Ignore, for free. Follow her on FacebookTwitter, and Instagram.

Featured CC image: Flickr, Laura Bernhardt.

Published by R.L. Stollar

R.L. Stollar is a child liberation theologian and an advocate for children and abuse survivors. The author of an upcoming book on child liberation theology, The Kingdom of Children, Ryan has an M.H.S. in Child Protection from Nova Southeastern University and an M.A. in Eastern Classics from St. John’s College.

8 thoughts on “Three Reasons Why We Don’t Pray the Sinner’s Prayer with Our Children

  1. “Are our children Christians? Absolutely, not because they’ve prayed the prayer, but because for now, we’ve given them a place to belong, under the leadership of Christian parents who are doing our best to demonstrate the love and grace of Jesus Christ.”

    Sorry, but God has no grandchildren, and we as Christian parents cannot give Him any, in spite of our best intentions.
    God only has sons and daughters, and it is only to those who believe on Jesus that God gives power to become children of God (John 1:12-13:”12 But to all who did receive him, who believed in his name, he gave the right to become children of God, 13 who were born, not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man, but of God.”)

    That being said, it is not the “Sinner’s Prayer” that saves us, it is a living, active faith in Jesus.

  2. You make it sound like being a Christian is a cultural identity that they can inherit by being around it and deciding to embrace the traditions. That’s not it at all. It’s a relationship with God that, yes, is very personal, and has nothing to do with what someone’s parent’s traditions are. And yes, it does start with acknowledging sin, because that’s the whole point. Jesus came to save us from that sin. Christianity is not a tradition, it’s acknowledging that we are sinners and need the saving grace of Jesus Christ.

    1. Jennifer, you said, “And yes, it does start with acknowledging sin, because that’s the whole point. Jesus came to save us from that sin.” If it starts with acknowledging sin, shouldn’t it go back all the way to the very beginning and acknowledge Adam and Eve’s sin? And if the answer is “yes,” well, I wasn’t around back then. It’s not my fault that I inherited a sin nature – I didn’t choose it!

    2. Jennifer, you appear to be using one interpretation of Jesus’ death: substitutionary atonement theory. Many object to “theory” in labeling it. But while it may seem “everyone” holds to it in some Christian circles, there are many sincere Christians who understand “original sin” as well as Jesus’ role in atonement differently, based on various parts of the Bible. And that’s within “orthodoxy”.

      Then there are us “further out” and “progressive” Christians who many would not even include as Christians. We are “unorthodox” [“heretical”, to many] but highly motivated to get to truth and follow Jesus as he wanted to be followed.

      Maybe some of our kids will become like that… whether or not they prayed the sinner’s prayer. (Which I did and followed it with serious discipleship for decades before “going liberal”.) Maybe they will be Christian but not believe in “original sin”.

  3. Cindy, I think you are spot on with this. There is an old book by Scottish pastor William Still entitled “Bringing up children in faith not fear”. At one level it’s an argument for infant baptism ( which I don’t accept) but at deeper level it’s about our children being included in the covenant of grace where they are held as it were by our faith until such times as they are ready ( by God’s grace and Spirit, not us scaring them with hell) to make their own commitment to Christ, or not if they so will.

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: