Applebee’s Overnight Social Media Meltdown: A Photo Essay

Hell hath no fury like a Facebook scorned. In today’s digital age, most of us assume everyone understands this fact. But every now and again, people surprise us. An ever-increasing element of this reality is that the hounds of Reddit, the Twitter armies, and Facebook vigilantes are more than willing to remind people that we live in a publicized world. You can’t hide behind privacy statements or legal jargon or appeals to company policy to pacify an Internet mob. Once you cross the line of Internet etiquette, the people of the World Wide Web will hunt you down and do their best to ruin you forever.

Applebee’s apparently never took note of this. You’ve most likely heard about their most recent encounter with virality. But in case you’ve been living under a rock, here’s a brief summary:

A waitress at a St. Louis Applebee’s lost her job for posting online the receipt upon which a pastor had declined to leave a tip, with a snarky note saying she gave God 10 percent.

After her dinner on Jan. 25, Pastor Alois Bell crossed out the automatic 18 percent tip charged for parties of more than eight. “I give God 10% why do you get 18,” she wrote above her signature.

Employee Chelsea Welch — a colleague of the stiffed server — took a picture of the receipt and uploaded it to the online site Reddit. She subsequently lost her job, an Applebee’s spokesman confirmed to TheSmokingGun.com, for violating a customer’s privacy.

Yesterday on Fox 2 Now, the pastor issued a (sort of?) apology.

All this information, of course, is so yesterday. “Pastor gets server fired” was Chapter One in this strangely entrancing saga, on par with a slow-motion train wreck from which you cannot tear away your eyes. Chapter Two is where Applebee’s apparently wants to commit suicide in front of our digital eyes.

Applebee’s fired the server in question, named Chelsea Welch. This created a fury of rage on the Internet, with social media users taking to their weapons of choice and lambasting away, thousands at a time, against the restaurant’s decisions. Numerous “Boycott Applebee’s” groups sprung up on Facebook, along with “Rehire Chelsea Welch” and other similar groups. Applebee’s website has a “What’s the Buzz” widget, that shows what people are saying on Twitter about the company. It’s been non-stop attacks, all publicly displayed on Applebee’s own page:

But it started to get interesting last night. Earlier in the day, around 3 pm, Applebee’s made a status updated about the controversy:

Applebee’s social media team decided to respond to the growing clamor by saying, “We wish this situation didn’t happen…Our franchisee has apologized to the Guest and has taken disciplinary action with the Team Member for violating their Guest’s right to privacy.” Around midnight last night, the reaction against this status had grown to a frenzy. There were well over 10,000 comments on the post, most of them negative.

There was a repeated theme to the comments, which the media has so far not covered. Applebee’s, just two weeks ago, had — according to comments — violated another Guest’s right to privacy themselves by posting a picture of a note from a guest that clearly featured the guest’s name. Most interestingly, Applebee’s deleted this picture right when the Chelsea Welch issue went viral. Here’s the original picture, captured by If You Can’t Afford to Tip… via screen shot:

Users of Facebook were sharing this picture left and right, using it to call bull@#$% on Applebee’s reasoning regarding “right to privacy.” Here’s just a small sampling:

By around 2 am, there were around 17,000 comments on Applebee’s original Facebook status. Then began the most bewildering move in corporate social media/public relations that I have ever witnessed. At 2:53 am, the middle of the night, whoever manages Applebee’s Facebook page started making comments on their status update. In response to the over 17,000 comments, the following statement appeared — not as a new status update, but as a comment on the status update. (Had to break it into two pieces to capture it.)

I was, to put it plainly, stunned. Surely this was someone using a fake Applebee’s page to make a comment. Commenting on your own status update during the biggest PR disaster in the history of your company at 2:53 am is the exact definition of social media suicide. Assuming this was a fake Applebee’s account, I clicked on the name. It took me right back to the page I was on. This was an official Applebee’s person. Commenting at 2:53 am.

But that, readers, is just the beginning. Oh it gets better. So much better.

The reaction was immediate:

Legitimate points. I mean, you can’t drop an official response in the middle of post that’s expanding 1K+ posts an hour. It becomes nearly impossible to find after 5 minutes.

Now, before I continue with the train wreck that follows, I’d like to sidetrack for a quick moment and reveal something else: the entire night, Applebee’s is allegedly deleting negative comments left and right, as well as blocking people from its Facebook page. People at this point are getting furious at being censored (again, a small sampling):

So people are getting furious at being censored. Then Applebee’s social media makes a comment on a status update at 2:53 am. Next up: Applebee’s starts repeatedly tagging people in the middle of the night and repeating their same comment over and over… and over. It’s now about 3 am in the morning:

This should come as no surprise, but — people don’t really like this repetition. It kinda gets under their skin. And they don’t hesitate to let Applebee’s know:

You’d think at this point in time someone in Applebee’s social media team would advise whoever is posting on behalf of Applebee’s to just lay low for a while. But no — the unthinkable happens. At 3:06 am, Applebee’s starts tagging people and arguing with them:

Naturally, people don’t take kindly to this:

Around 4:20 am, Applebee’s finally and brilliantly decides to take its comment on its status update and make it an actual status update so it doesn’t have to keep repeating itself via comments:

This now prompts people to comment on both the original status update as well as the new status update. I went to bed at 5 am. As of 5 am, the original status update had 19,027 comments. As of 5 am, the new status update had 2,111 comments.

I check back into Applebee’s Facebook page today at 2 pm. And guess what? That original status update, with almost 20,000 comments that featured Applebee’s complete social media meltdown? It is deleted, along with all those comments. But the problem is, the Internet doesn’t forget things like that. Which Applebee’s should have learned by this point in this controversy. People take it upon themselves to remind Applebee’s about that (now deleted) post:

Applebee’s now makes its most brilliant move, posting, “No posts have been deleted.”

There were many and numerous responses to this, but I think the shortest was the best:

Denial is apparently the company’s PR weapon of choice. But as my saved screenshots show, their original status update is gone. There is still the one posted at 4:20 am, which now — at 2 pm — has gone from 2,111 comments at 5 am to 9,679. And there is a new status update from Applebee’s posted at around 10 am this morning that has 7,292 comments. The status update is as follows:

As of 5:15 pm, Applebee’s social media was continuing to argue with people in the comments section, provoking one person to say, “Applebees, just shut up”:

As of 8 pm when I write this, the tallies for comments are as follows: the original post, now deleted, was at 19,027 when I last saw it; the second post is at 11,216; the third post is at 11,035. That’s 41,278 mostly negative comments — and who knows how many more there were before Applebee’s started deleting comments, not just posts. I wonder why Applebee’s just doesn’t disable comments at this point.

The upshot of this is, the Internet is laughing. And Applebee’s is losing a lot of customers. After personally reading thousands and thousands of comments, I have seen businesses and non-profits and families and individuals all say they are boycotting or even canceling reservations or changing locations for regular business lunches and dinners. Surely there was a better way to handle this that wouldn’t have led to comments such as:

Amidst all the rubble, though, there was one comment that stood out. Because it was a moment of kind-heartedness, which I appreciate after swimming through the filth and sarcasm and anger of the Internet:

***

Updates, 02/02/2013

1. Readers have pointed out to me that Applebee’s did not delete the original post. Allegedly Applebee’s “hid” the post here.

2. If You Can’t Afford to Tip… informed me that they took the original screen shot of the other receipt that allegedly Applebee’s had posted and then deleted. You can view it on their Facebook page here. I changed the original post to reflect that, and am restating it as an update as well.

3. Did Applebee’s block me?

4. I must be unblocked, because now — as of 8 pm tonight — I can see Applebee’s still going back and forth with people. But on Twitter this time. *sigh*

***

Updates, 02/04-9/2013

1. As of 4:45 pm today (02/04), I was told (and verified) that Applebee’s has made public the previously hidden post.

2. This story now has over 1,400,000 views.

3. The following is a list of notable places this photo essay has been referenced:

Published by R.L. Stollar

R.L. Stollar is a child liberation theologian and an advocate for children and abuse survivors. The author of an upcoming book on child liberation theology, The Kingdom of Children, Ryan has an M.H.S. in Child Protection from Nova Southeastern University and an M.A. in Eastern Classics from St. John’s College.

1,276 thoughts on “Applebee’s Overnight Social Media Meltdown: A Photo Essay

  1. I am still SO confused why a guess ticket is “PRIVATE”. When the heck did that happen? Its not health care, or legal advice. If you buy a house, its PUBLIC RECORD. Who the hell cares if you bought chicken wings at an Applebees? What is SO private? Don’t write stupid crap on a bill – you wont get publicly flamed – including the servers that were recently outed by writing descriptive things on their customer’s tabs.

    1. It’s not “public record,” because it’s no one’s business what you had at Applebee’s. That said, it was unbelievably rude for the customer to write that on the slip, and inappropriate for an employee to post it publicly. *However*, I agree that it should not be a firing offense unless this was an employee with a long string of errors and warnings behind her. Applebee’s should be almost as ashamed of themselves as the preacher should be for that pompous little comment.

  2. Am I the only person who noticed that the “guest” did NOT pay the automatic 18% gratuity. It was crossed out, they wrote in zero on the additional tip line, and under the total they restated the original pre-tip total. Why is Applebee’s saying the 18% was paid. Not unless you’re going to charge a credit card more than the total the customer signed for — that will be an entirely different PR nightmare.

    1. The gratuity was paid. The POS charges the gratuity automatically for partys of 8 of more. The total plus gratuity is printed on ink. The customer has the opportunity to add an additional gratuity and then must sign for that addition.The 18% has already been charged by that point.

    2. Actually, since their menu states that an 18% gratuity is added for any party over 8, Applebee’s is within its rights to go ahead and charge the card with the additional 18%, whether the customer crossed it out or not. It’d be like deciding you didn’t like the onion soup, and crossing off your total to reflect the fact that you weren’t going to pay for it. If the customer really didn’t want to pay the 18%, they needed to speak to a manager and have it removed.

  3. Great post, and thanks to it, I’m now following your blog. Simply amazing that in 2013 – 2013!!! – a social media & PR meltdown of this magnitude occurred.

  4. Reblogged this on Weapon of Self-Distraction and commented:
    This is a great overview of Applebee’s huge social media meltdown from a week ago. Amazing that this happened in 2013; its not like the interwebs are a brand new thing…but to Applebee’s PR folks – make that former PR folks – it certainly is/was!

  5. I’ve posted several times. Explored the “Pastor” Bell and her congregation of 15, many family members. Mean spirited witch calls up Applebee’s and demands everyone be fired. My last post until now was this a.m. It continues. Galaxy’s past a FUBAR!

  6. What boggles my mind at least as much as the stupidity of their responses, was the basic English language errors: “your” for “you’re,” and “their” when it should have been “they’re.” Clearly, the ignorance runs deep hereabouts. The fact that they have someone with–at best–a tenuous grasp of the language posting in what is doubtless the most-watched thread in Applebee’s history does not speak well for their hiring choices.

  7. The PR guy has no idea that gratuity must be approved by the guest. They can cross out the gratuity and just leave cash instead of paying on their card. Or they can cross out the gratuity and leave nothing, and the server will have to write 0 when checking out.

  8. Pingback: Don Media's Blog
  9. Question: who is this Mindy Fratella on Facebook who claims to be an Applebee’s CEO, but is spending her time berating people in the comments? Is she actually a CEO? If so, how does she still have a job after this?

    1. Michael J. Archer is the CEO on record. Mindy Fratella has no presence on the Internet. In other words. just a troll. Besides, corporate lawyers would never allow someone to tip the companie’s hand concerning legal action.

  10. This is great, hilarious and enlightening all over the place. Thanks for the trouble of putting it together in a so kindly fashion. Hats-off.

  11. nathanaelculver – I am a subject of the British (ex)-Empire, though I have been living and working in America for the past fifteen years.
    nathanael says:

    I think the best response to this is who cares about Facebook hordes or Internet slactivism? This blog entry, running way over its alloted quota of supersized adjectives, is attempting to stir up a tempest in a teapot, as if what happens on FB is somehow important outside the Zuckerbergian Universe.

    It’s not.

    Toss in the fact that neither of the central tenets of this little circus is actually true — Bell stiffing one waitress and getting another fired — and what we’re left with it just the latest example of knee-jerk faux outrage, Internet flashmob style.

    1. Yes, anyone would think it was Watergate or the Kennedy assassination. I’m willing to bet it makes 0 difference to the companies bottom line.

      Frankly I’m embarrassed the author thinks it’s a good use of his time watching the facebook page and spending so much time on this twaddle.

    2. If you don’t see the relevance in this story, you’re not paying attention. I suggest looking for the forest and not the trees.

      This has nothing to do with a cheap “pastor” and a firing. Nothing to do with “slactivism”.

      The real story is the continuing shift of customer/corporate power and who controls corporate messaging. If you’re not involved in business marketing and/or social media then yeah… “who cares” is an appropriate response. But I can tell you for a fact – those of us who live this world and make it our jobs -DEFINITELY- care about things like this.

      1. nathanaelculver – I am a subject of the British (ex)-Empire, though I have been living and working in America for the past fifteen years.
        nathanael says:

        “The real story is the continuing shift of customer/corporate power and who controls corporate messaging.”

        Perhaps. Bottom line is none of this will impact the bottom line in the least. Applebee’s will continue to rake in profits, a few thousand angry FB slactivists — a small minority of which might actually get around to boycotting Applebee’s, for a week or two — notwithstanding.

        “But I can tell you for a fact – those of us who live this world and make it our jobs -DEFINITELY- care about things like this.”

        Hmm. Maybe you folks should get out more. This tempest in a teapot will blow over, Applebee’s will still be standing, Welch will still be (deservedly) unemployed, and Bell will still be a pastor. Social media just ain’t all that.

  12. Although gratuity is printed on a receipt, this is considered a service so you DO NOT have to pay the gratuity. It is not charged until you sign the receipt and add it into the total. Applebee’s was protecting the guest at hand, there is a signature on the slip and the last 4 digits of your card along with what kind of card it its. Applebee’s does have policies in place in a handbook that talks about social media with a new hire before they start with the franchise. Just ask yourself, if this was you as the guest, would you want all your important info like that put there for everyone to see? I doubt it! Although I do agree that what the guest wrote was a little overboard, they have rights to be protected with financial information regarding there signature or what kind of card and last digits of it are!

  13. Why should the pastor giving 10% to their religious organisation have anything to do with tipping percentages, tax rates, inflation rates, shoe sizes, or anything else?

Leave a Reply to essar1Cancel reply

Discover more from R.L. Stollar

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading

Exit mobile version